This post is dedicated to my friend, Daisy, who would love and appreciate this book even more than me!
The very idea that Einstein and Freud, both German scientists met and had a conversation is intriguing to me. I would have loved to have been a fly on that wall!
By Richard Panek
Penguin Press
Copyright © 2004 by Richard Panek, ISBN: 0-6700-3074-0
Available for purchase at amazon.com
Excerpts
They met only once. During the New Year's holiday season of 1927, Albert Einstein called on Sigmund Freud, who was staying at the home of one of his sons in Berlin. Einstein, at forty-seven, was the foremost living symbol of the physical sciences, while Freud, at seventy, was his equal in the social sciences, but the evening was hardly a meeting of the minds. When a friend wrote Einstein just a few months later suggesting that he allow himself to undergo psychoanalysis, Einstein answered, "I regret that I cannot accede to your request, because I should like very much to remain in the darkness of not having been analyzed." Or, as Freud wrote to a friend regarding Einstein immediately after their meeting in Berlin, "He understands as much about psychology as I do about physics, so we had a very pleasant talk."
Freud and Einstein shared a native language, German, but their respective professional vocabularies had long since diverged, to the point that they now seemed virtually irreconcilable. Even so, Freud and Einstein had more in common than they might have imagined. Many years earlier, at the beginning of their respective scientific investigations, they both had reached what would prove to be the same pivotal juncture.
Each had been exploring one of the foremost problems in his field.
Each had found himself confronting an obstacle that had defeated everyone else exploring the problem.
In both their cases, this obstacle was the same: a lack of more evidence. Yet rather than retreat from this absence and look elsewhere or concede defeat and stop looking, Einstein and Freud had kept looking anyway.
Looking, after all, was what scientists did.
It was what defined the scientific method. It was what had precipitated the Scientific Revolution, some three centuries earlier.
In 1610, Galileo Galilei reported that upon looking through a new instrument into the celestial realm he saw forty stars in the Pleiades cluster where previously everyone else had seen only six, five hundred new stars in the constellation of Orion, "a congeries of innumerable stars" in another stretch of the night sky, and then, around Jupiter, moons.
Beginning in 1674, Antonius von Leeuwenhoek reported that upon looking at terrestrial objects through another new instrument he saw "upwards of one million living creatures" in a drop of water. Such discoveries were not without precedent. They came, in fact, at the end of the Age of Discovery. If an explorer of the seas could discover a New World, then why should an explorer of the heavens not discover new worlds? And if those same sea voyages proved that the Earth could house innumerable creatures previously unknown, then why not earth itself or even one drop of water?
There is more to the universe than meets the naked eye.
Who knew? For thousands of years, the number of objects in the heavens had been fixed at six thousand or so. Now, there were...more. Since the Creation, or at least since the Flood, the number of kinds of creatures on Earth, however incalculable as a practical matter, had nonetheless been fixed. Now, there were...more.
Because now all you had to do was look. Through the telescope you could see farther than with the naked eye alone and, by seeing farther, discover new worlds without. Through the microscope you could see deeper than with the naked eye alone and, by seeing deeper, discover new worlds within. By seeing more than meets the naked eye and then seeing yet more, you could discover more.
How much more? It was a logical question for natural philosophers to ask themselves, and the search for an answer that ensued over the next three centuries was nothing if not logical: a systematic pursuit of the truths of nature to the outermost and innermost realms of the universe, until by the turn of the twentieth century the search had reached the very limits of human perception even with the aid of optical instruments, and investigators of nature had begun to wonder: What now?
They'd kept looking until they discovered an entirely new kind of scientific evidence: evidence that no manner of mere looking was going to reveal; evidence that lay beyond the realm of the visible; evidence that was, to all appearances, invisible.
When Isaac Newton reached the limits of his understanding of the outer universe, he had invoked the concept of gravity. When René Descartes reached the limits of his understanding of the inner universe, he had invoked the concept of consciousness.
But by the turn of the twentieth century the kind of invisibility that certain investigators were beginning to invoke was new. These were scientists for whom any appeal to the supernatural, superstitious, or metaphysical would have been anathema. But now, here it was: evidence that was invisible yet scientifically incontrovertible, to their minds, anyway.
Although Einstein and Freud didn't initiate this second scientific revolution all by themselves, they did come to represent it and in large measure embody it. This is the story of how their respective investigations reached unprecedented realms, relativity and the unconscious; how their further pursuits led to the somewhat inadvertent creation of two new sciences, cosmology and psychoanalysis; and how in Einstein's case, a new way of doing science has become the dominant methodology throughout the sciences, while in Freud's case, an alternative way of doing science has become the dominant exception, the key to the very question of what qualifies an intellectual endeavor as a science. This is also the story of what cosmology and psychoanalysis have allowed usto explore: universes, without and within, as vast in comparison to the ones they replaced as those had been to the ones they replaced.
And in that regard Einstein and Freud's is a story, of seeing itself-of perception, of how we see. It is also, then, a question of thinking about seeing- of conception, of how we think about how we see. It is a new means of discovery-the significance of which, a hundred years later, we are still only beginning to comprehend:
That there is more to the universe than we would ever find, if all we ever did was look.
©1998-2004 Penguin Group (USA) Inc. All rights reserved
It sounds like one of those magical trips where one could describe the way all things are relative in the outer world and the other describe the relevance of the inner world ... and perhaps, those two brilliant minds would discover, right before our very eyes, the inter-connectedness of all things?
I'm happy to share the view with all of you!
No comments:
Post a Comment